From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8E7FD3858289; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:12:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E7FD3858289
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682435533;
	bh=B5yzFT9Uq6GQijbhKQM7mWT3aHS0ZYDLGzZOBnyezDg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aQtdxz8u31AI7eEyDj0VLAnwAa2c5VYkW40Jt0WW/TRtEcZrNCddW5xuG1Oi/xhDx
	 j6xxg0v1rXso5ljgsnw1uYxFOQN2eLZ0oL7rfD8UxVjliYT0zALioDOmdXkYuO8mnT
	 d27k95M+2uQ5B1UQf4rrURZQCHxwnLHAs5zCe0SM=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/103528] [12/13/14 regression] d21 doesn't build on Solaris
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:12:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: d
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-103528-4-bSE1AJsH5y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103528

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #19 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> What's the status of this bug now?

AFAICS everything is in place now, both code and documentation changes.=