public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "llvm at rifkin dot dev" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103559] New: Can't optimize away < 0 check on sqrt
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 20:58:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103559

            Bug ID: 103559
           Summary: Can't optimize away < 0 check on sqrt
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: llvm at rifkin dot dev
  Target Milestone: ---

For a simple invocation of sqrt, gcc inserts a < 0 check to set math errno if
needed. E.g.

float f(float x) {
    return sqrt(x);
}

Is generated as

f(float):
        vxorps  xmm1, xmm1, xmm1
        vucomiss        xmm1, xmm0
        ja      .L10
        vsqrtss xmm0, xmm0, xmm0
        ret
.L10:
        jmp     sqrtf


Unfortunately, this check is still present when the GCC is able to prove that x
is non-negative:

float f(float x) {
    if(x < 0) [[unlikely]] {
        __builtin_unreachable();
    } else {
        return sqrt(x);
    }
}

LLVM suffers from the same problem, even with __builtin_assume().
https://godbolt.org/z/ddcoMj3oz

This is a very common pattern, and I'd imagine the argument for sqrt is often
able to be shown to be positive. This would be a helpful enhancement.

             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-04 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-04 20:58 llvm at rifkin dot dev [this message]
2021-12-04 21:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103559] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-04 21:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-04 21:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-04 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-05 11:38 ` vanyacpp at gmail dot com
2023-03-29 17:46 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-29 18:34 ` llvm at rifkin dot dev
2023-03-29 18:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 10:40 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 10:53 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 11:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).