From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C8B763858C27; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:45:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8B763858C27 From: "asolokha at gmx dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103623] [12 Regression] error: unable to generate reloads (ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132), or error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2682) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:45:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: asolokha at gmx dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:45:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103623 --- Comment #19 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #17) > (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #16) > > Could there be any ld, or as, or glibc features involved that gcc's > > configure detects at build time? >=20 > btw, could you try the above configuration > which I used on x86_64 to confirm the configuration actually fails to > reproduce? Note that I don't have one actual directory for the sysroot > locally. >=20 > If you can confirm the above configuration also fails to reproduce on your > side, maybe you can isolate which configuration option matters by adding > those omitted back one by one on your side. No, w/ your configuration gcc also ICEs for me on that testcase. Is there any useful data that I could extract for you using gdb?=