From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3EF543858418; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:13:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3EF543858418 From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103623] [12 Regression] error: unable to generate reloads (ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132), or error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2682) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:13:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:13:49 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103623 --- Comment #17 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #16) > Could there be any ld, or as, or glibc features involved that gcc's > configure detects at build time? Good point, what's the version of binutils you used? Does it have any speci= al configuration options? btw, could you try the above configuration which I = used on x86_64 to confirm the configuration actually fails to reproduce? Note th= at I don't have one actual directory for the sysroot locally. If you can confirm the above configuration also fails to reproduce on your side, maybe you can isolate which configuration option matters by adding th= ose omitted back one by one on your side.=