From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 164E73858428; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:53:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 164E73858428
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679669632;
	bh=QgXNQrS4ZawOkUKV2v5yV36Y0NLCEphBVyrOWPXQrIg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IFcfuGxDMRYYqTXsk13dm6yNNj4HvKNilupt9fpwF9h0ECZoRVPxa4LMZois1U0zx
	 blSMsKPs+AwyGKG/htONFc2HJOp/d7SGHV8kaH7QQUQr3Uez3p8tJRLC0dL3GTbgRf
	 5/DzdSd5p9w4UWJuCOEnC5vAS8/c1oB7bNxYqP7w=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/103628] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
 gfc_conv_tree_to_mpfr)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:53:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103628-4-Xq8L0PdnpJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103628

--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #5)
> The memory representation of IBM long double is not unique. It's actually
> the sum of two 64-bit doubles.=20

Yes, and the first of those two DP numbers is required to be the full
number rounded to double precision (with round-to-nearest).

What happened here?  I cannot make much sense of those numbers, but it
seems to contain something with uppercase ASCII overwritten?=