public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/103641] [11/12 regression] Severe compile time regression in SLP vectorize step Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:24:32 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-103641-4-sRx9bVm8M8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-103641-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- PR 65951 added the support to the vectorizer in the first place but I suspect what changed between GCC 10 and GCC 11 were costs rather than anything else ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 10:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-10 9:03 [Bug rtl-optimization/103641] New: [aarch64][11 " husseydevin at gmail dot com 2021-12-10 9:25 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103641] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 9:37 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103641] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 9:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103641] [11/12 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 9:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 9:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:06 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:12 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:15 ` [Bug middle-end/103641] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 10:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-12-10 10:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-10 13:17 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2021-12-10 13:19 ` husseydevin at gmail dot com 2022-01-18 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-22 14:30 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2022-01-24 8:13 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-01-24 16:49 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2022-01-24 17:02 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2022-01-25 7:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-25 7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 7:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 10:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 10:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 11:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-07 12:19 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-07 15:05 ` [Bug middle-end/103641] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-08 8:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-08 8:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-08 8:15 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-16 8:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-16 8:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-103641-4-sRx9bVm8M8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).