From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5779B385E010; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:56:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5779B385E010 From: "stefan.kneifel at bluewin dot ch" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103661] New: __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for avx512vbmi2 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:56:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: stefan.kneifel at bluewin dot ch X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:56:17 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103661 Bug ID: 103661 Summary: __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for avx512vbmi2 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: stefan.kneifel at bluewin dot ch Target Milestone: --- __builtin_cpu_supports is supposed to return a positive integer if the run-= time CPU supports the requested feature and zero otherwise (see Documentation). However, for the feature "avx512vbmi2", a negative integer (0x80000000) is returned. FEATURE_AVX512VBMI2 equals to 31 in gcc/common/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.h, = thus the returned 32-bit integer has bit 31 set and is therefore negative. This might lead to surprising errors even inside GCC (e.g. when features are tested in automatically generated resolvers; the code seems to rely on the positivity). Would it be an acceptable solution to declare __builtin_cpu_supports as unsigned, or do you see another solution?=