public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103682] New: [12 regression] ICE on atomics: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2852
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:36:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103682-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103682

            Bug ID: 103682
           Summary: [12 regression] ICE on atomics: gimple check: expected
                    gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in
                    gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2852
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

ICE extracted from a real project:

$ cat bug.cpp

  #include <atomic>

  bool bug(std::atomic<unsigned> & ready, unsigned u) {
    return (ready.fetch_and(~u) & u);
  }

$ g++-12.0.0 -Ofast -c bug.cpp
during GIMPLE pass: fab
bug.cpp: In function 'bool bug(std::atomic<unsigned int>&, unsigned int)':
bug.cpp:6:6: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected
gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at
gimple.h:2852
    6 | bool bug(std::atomic<unsigned> & ready, unsigned u) {
      |      ^~~
0x20a58f7 internal_error(char const*, ...)
        ???:0
0x7c76dd gimple_check_failed(gimple const*, char const*, int, char const*,
gimple_code, tree_code)
        ???:0

$ g++-12.0.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/nix/store/3x3yy5hhikzn8zvhq5fj14a2m9qyxbc8-gcc-12.0.0/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/nix/store/3x3yy5hhikzn8zvhq5fj14a2m9qyxbc8-gcc-12.0.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/12.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with:
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20211212 (experimental) (GCC)

             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-13 12:36 slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-13 12:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103682] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 12:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103682] [12 regression] ICE on atomics: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2852 since r12-5486-g7df89377a7ae3906 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 12:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14  1:12 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-12-14 23:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 23:47 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-12-14 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103682-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).