public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "seurer at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/103697] New: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 fails after r12-5926 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:47:07 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-103697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103697 Bug ID: 103697 Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 fails after r12-5926 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:494ebfa7c9aacaeb6ec1fccc47a0e49f31eb2bb8, r12-5926 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="goacc.exp=gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90" FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 53 (test for warnings, line 28) # of expected passes 9 # of unexpected failures 1 /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O -fopenacc -fopt-info-omp-note --param=openacc-privatization=noisy -S -o privatization-1-compute-loop.s /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'count.1' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'count.0' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'i' in 'private' clause potentially has improper OpenACC privatization level: 'parm_decl' /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'j' in 'private' clause potentially has improper OpenACC privatization level: 'parm_decl' /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'a' in 'private' clause potentially has improper OpenACC privatization level: 'parm_decl' /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'x' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'y' in 'private' clause is candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'C.2727' declared in block potentially has improper OpenACC privatization level: 'const_decl' /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90:28:85: note: variable 'y' ought to be adjusted for OpenACC privatization level: 'vector' PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 46 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O TODO at line 47 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O TODO at line 48 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O TODO at line 49 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 50 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 51 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O TODO at line 52 (test for warnings, line 28) FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 53 (test for warnings, line 28) PASS: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 54 (test for warnings, line 28) Some others are failing, too. Full list: FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90 -O at line 53 (test for warnings, line 28) FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute.f90 -O at line 46 (test for warnings, line 27) FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-routine_gang-loop.f90 -O at line 53 (test for warnings, line 28) commit 494ebfa7c9aacaeb6ec1fccc47a0e49f31eb2bb8 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon Dec 13 12:37:40 2021 +0100 Fortran: Handle compare in OpenMP atomic
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 22:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-13 22:47 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-12-14 6:21 ` [Bug testsuite/103697] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-14 21:00 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-103697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).