From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 28F883858C27; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:13:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 28F883858C27
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated
 for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:13:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103721-4-KwpOwmSqrv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:13:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103721

--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase for PR104067 shows an example where the dominance matters,
irregardless of if we reset relations at the backedge point.  There we have=
 a
path that looks like 9->3->5->...:

 <bb 3> [local count: 1063004409]:
  # j_17 =3D PHI <j_2(9), 0(2)>
  # q_18 =3D PHI <prephitmp_16(9), &a(2)>
  # ivtmp_4 =3D PHI <ivtmp_3(9), 99(2)>
  j_8 =3D j_17 + 1;
  if (j_8 =3D=3D 10)
    goto <bb 5>; [34.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 4>; [66.00%]

  <bb 4> [local count: 701582906]:
  _1 =3D (sizetype) j_8;
  _15 =3D _1 * 4;
  _14 =3D &a + _15;

  <bb 5> [local count: 1063004409]:
  # j_2 =3D PHI <j_8(4), 0(3)>
  # prephitmp_16 =3D PHI <_14(4), &a(3)>
  if (prephitmp_16 =3D=3D q_18)
    goto <bb 6>; [0.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 7>; [100.00%]

  <bb 9> [local count: 1052374367]:
  goto <bb 3>; [100.00%]

Even if we reset relations and clear the root oracle at the backedge (9->3)=
, we
still get the _16 =3D=3D _18 in BB3, followed by the DEF of _16 in BB5.=