From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 98DE73858D39; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:34:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 98DE73858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672936493; bh=6wldjhWJvbn8uy3glrLFJTQgYg7CJZVCMxMlOzQnBw8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oX60Kj3O2gsQ04RvJQdBhcba8IJllUpDEoGchtjmvOzRtMT5RHN70gVAjEBTqdual oC4O7UhRrVw13P7dhqGit6fnbBndTQxE00m5DGM5rcsN1PyhEZN/C/13fPb17fAi24 3s/CRzovWiPMiGnqPZ+cMPQ2LFHEVw+QYHXoNP6M= From: "jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103784] suboptimal code for returning bool value on target ppc Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 16:34:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103784 --- Comment #8 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- Using -O3 with gcc13, I got (with the test in comment 2): For P8: cmpwi 0,3,2 bgt 0,.L3 subfic 4,4,9 srdi 3,4,63 xori 3,3,0x1 rldicl 3,3,0,63 blr .p2align 4,,15 .L3: li 3,0 rldicl 3,3,0,63 blr For P10: cmpwi 0,3,2 bgt 0,.L3 cmpwi 0,4,9 setbcr 3,1 rldicl 3,3,0,63 blr .p2align 4,,15 .L3: li 3,0 rldicl 3,3,0,63 blr=