From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 591DF3858D35; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 14:07:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 591DF3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672841227;
	bh=V6jJJN2jZjHO77qUrFHrvtrn37hgMT0RDnQkY8uP3ug=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Q/VN6hGs+Oy4QcF9mlwaw7OPm9NPXQPw9FeI53ovSKe/Yts5wBGqAmJjjSccJtdVA
	 c6HeCJ1Mfsqlc6q4vseDRf0ohIUxQSQlr7CoTMzu8ehpdIPScW3vl37e2mv/D494ff
	 PRoBF0yVr+HfXtJI95iYeVs0eq8U7Cr6VeLIXOZQ=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/103784] suboptimal code for returning bool value on
 target ppc
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 14:07:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103784-4-MOZAMC4tJS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103784-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103784-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103784

--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get simply

        subfic 3,3,2
        srdi 3,3,63
        xori 3,3,0x1
        blr

for this code.  Did you use -O0 or similar?=