From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5BED63858D39; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:52:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5BED63858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678960359; bh=jyH6VkxVggXA4cn8ughMcnPZMBFAXx1ccCXpJ1pqZSg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q3Yw5lHGO+vx4I0cSmw9lNKfVnghZAQ0eCDuPHUBKwFzmxCQlhVQtgH4j43Kn8TN8 jE4C6A+FC4t1saF47kKhYQj/EqE2GDgSGLiTQ6wee9dZka6VMGnOXEuFfDezAQ52uF YDT8PsMUt8KM2teeACqSp2G1DCAcLVWMXmm5qTN4= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103784] suboptimal code for returning bool value on target ppc Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:52:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103784 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- I get, for -mcpu=3Dpower9 or power10 foo: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc cmpwi 0,3,2 bgt 0,.L3 cmpwi 0,4,9 li 3,1 isel 3,0,3,1 blr .p2align 4,,15 .L3: li 3,0 blr and I don't see any zero_extend anywhere.=