From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 446A43858C60; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 14:28:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 446A43858C60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688826488; bh=hG59LXRf1HisEbR49Qx53ApUi1Jl//kNyL5UIJYBmWo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Nc6en8cggmCk7u2gnzqqBA4GCIlt15Ip6hUMIUevcmNc0VuvgB5kqta7ZvTABEZE5 87AA2LyDC2+C6r+HMPromKJDS8hUMKu8ukPPMeBLxj5y10/e8FquXVbe/QgOPehgSp tXmTb+YUl+N970myu3TC8yfp0EgMa7FlO5wQ5svc= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1 Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2023 14:28:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103796 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Steve correctly noted in pr105526#c5 that his patch provides parsing of the form-team-spec-list, although it will only emit a sorry-type error message for a not implemented feature, instead of a syntax error. Reopening, so that his patch won't be lost. This PR might be referenced in a suitable coarray meta-bug.=