public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/103831] views::lazy_split accepts Pattern as span<int, 1> when V is input_range
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 15:41:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103831-4-ELJT2wkw6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103831-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103831

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-12-26
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Interestingly, adding the (correct and passing) assert

  static_assert(!std::ranges::__detail::__tiny_range<decltype(p)>);

before the last line causes us to reject the last line with

  /home/patrick/code/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges:2953:12: error:
satisfaction value of atomic constraint
‘requires{std::ranges::__detail::__require_constant<(std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type::size)()>;}
[with _Range = std::span<int, 1>]’ changed from ‘false’ to ‘true’


Looks like this is indeed a frontend bug, which can be distilled into the
testcase

struct A {
  constexpr int size() { return 42; }
};

template<class T>
struct B : T {
  static_assert(A::size() == 42);
};

We incorrectly accept the non-dependent call A::size() here even though it's
being performed from a context where there is no 'this' object.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-26 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-26 11:33 [Bug libstdc++/103831] New: " hewillk at gmail dot com
2021-12-26 15:41 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-26 16:21 ` [Bug c++/103831] non-dependent call to non-static member function not rejected ahead of time when there are dependent bases and no 'this' hewillk at gmail dot com
2022-01-11 18:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 17:25 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 17:26 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103831-4-ELJT2wkw6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).