From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0974A3858D3C; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:44:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0974A3858D3C
From: "georgii.shagov@be-tse.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/103843] Direct call to Desctructor is optimized out
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:44:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: georgii.shagov@be-tse.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution
Message-ID: <bug-103843-4-nJh1jpmXsw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103843-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103843-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:44:59 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103843

Georgii.Shagov <georgii.shagov@be-tse.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|INVALID                     |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Georgii.Shagov <georgii.shagov@be-tse.de> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This is undefined code. The object is officially not live after you call =
the
> deconstructor so GCC is able to remove the store from the deconstructor as
> being dead.

I appreciate your reply. But this is confusing. The object was NOT released
(de-allocated). In essence Destructor is just a function. Why the content of
the class had been re-initialized?
IMU: there should be not such obvious difference between optimized and
non-optimized code

thnx in advance.=