From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 439DE3858C60; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 14:43:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 439DE3858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672843391;
	bh=6GJxCilF6fHoeJKtuRwFDqHtCl7XiCTY28tORNOR+FQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mDLOaoaWyNgcC3D9yWuT14+yvNlxw8SJzr5xcAMA6lEzg1SlqCoarMZzy5qschTSM
	 FLxfFmxViRTT5NgxYjLtM8BC2JuZCWhTp2s4xWSaOJCmq7xaNAQYmFKxyOrPgPSO2Q
	 es+xTjGa0TJbn6RL81yj+kxhZeI8GKuyPSmHaoqE=
From: "kiwixz at outlook dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/103871] [11/12/13 Regression] co_await causes build error
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 14:43:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kiwixz at outlook dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103871-4-jkL7JS9bnh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103871

--- Comment #16 from kiwixz at outlook dot com ---
Hi, I wonder if there is any update on this ?

It's still present in trunk, and I would like to upgrade from GCC 10 to lat=
est.

Is it worth just applying the workaround for now or does it have a chance t=
o be
fixed in GCC 13 ?

Thanks,=