From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CBAC33858C39; Sun,  2 Jan 2022 13:20:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CBAC33858C39
From: "bau2wux4sh at pkv73 dot anonbox.net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/103889] gccgo is unable to find its standard library by
 default on 64-Bit RISC-V
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 13:20:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bau2wux4sh at pkv73 dot anonbox.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103889-4-yXxLSklllL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 13:20:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103889

--- Comment #9 from John Doe <bau2wux4sh at pkv73 dot anonbox.net> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Also there is much support we can do on modified sources really.

Yes, I totally understand that I was just looking for some guidance on how =
to
debug this further to come up with a fix.

> But I didn't see any patches which would have modified this part.

Right. I also don't think this is a problem introduced by the Alpine patchs=
et.

> I suspect there is some funny multilib/non-multilib going on with RISCV p=
ort really.

So the problem isn't that gcc/config/riscv/t-linux assumes lib32/lib64
directories to be present? I just find this surprising because other
architecture configuration files I looked at include a specific check to en=
sure
that these directories are present.=