From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9BD643858C60; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:19:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9BD643858C60 From: "nekotekina at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103897] New: x86: Missing optimizations with _mm_undefined_si128 and PMOVSX* Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:19:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nekotekina at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:19:54 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103897 Bug ID: 103897 Summary: x86: Missing optimizations with _mm_undefined_si128 and PMOVSX* Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nekotekina at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I was trying to use VPMOVSXWD and other PMOVSX* intrinsics and also emulate them for SSE2 targets. I noticed two (at least) distinct problems: 1) (V)PMOVSX** can use a memory operand, but emits a separate load instruct= ion. 2) _mm_undefined_si128() always generates an additional zeroing instruction. Using it in combination with unpack and arithmetic shift instructions looks like an optimal way to emulate PMOVSX for SSE2 target. Godbolt example includes clang output for comparison. https://godbolt.org/z/KE8q9v6qG #include #include __attribute__((__target__("avx"))) void test0(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Emit VPMOVSXWD: can combine load from memory, but emits 2 instructio= ns // Looks like gcc 8.5 was doing better *dst =3D _mm_cvtepi16_epi32(*src); } void test1(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Emulate VPMOVSXWD: sets zero specifically for _mm_undefined_si128 *dst =3D _mm_srai_epi32(_mm_unpacklo_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), *src)= , 16); } void test2(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Sets zero register but absolutely can reuse PSLLW result=20=20=20=20 *dst =3D _mm_srai_epi32(_mm_unpacklo_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), _mm_slli_epi16(*src, 1)), 16); } void test3(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Similar to test1, but emulate "high" VPMOVSXWD *dst =3D _mm_srai_epi32(_mm_unpackhi_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), *src)= , 16); } __attribute__((__target__("avx"))) void test4(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Bonus (not sure what is the idiomatic way to MOVSX high part) *dst =3D _mm_srai_epi32(_mm_unpackhi_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), *src)= , 16); } __attribute__((__target__("avx"))) void test5(__m128i* dst, __m128i* src) { // Emits two zeroing instructions *dst =3D _mm_srai_epi32(_mm_unpackhi_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), _mm_packs_epi16(_mm_undefined_si128(), *src)), 16); }=