From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E36683858C66; Sun,  2 Apr 2023 15:54:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E36683858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680450868;
	bh=Ej2d9ScjQwkeRK4xh4FGllYirDVcSNbRQif9B/GUuRw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZBZx8PZ3XsWSznkFCI31WbQ3zA8sxqqEhRlLd3s4AD15N2CCwI9nDIwDKnVMk3wKF
	 GGl9ucAIZ/3XKzjacMJxUEfGuk6X9IFSw5vukoVCaydMchgoDTd5TPgaWzAbaxosv1
	 vBj8UXshJVBcY7K4XIolEZrTbXA7PQDF/cmg0FJM=
From: "aldot at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/103931] Type name "c_ptr" is ambiguous when
 iso_c_binding is imported both directly and indirectly
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:54:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103931-4-IzYljZWU9F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103931

--- Comment #11 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <aldot at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #10)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #9)
> > The reduced testcase compiles for me with today's 13-trunk, but not
> > 12-branch.
> > However, the full original testcase fails with varying errors depending=
 on
> > the
> > gfortran version.
>=20
> Does the full testcase compile on trunk, with d7caf313525a, i assume?

Both the original testcase as well as the reduced testcase from comment #2
compile fine for me with trunk from earlier today at r13-6974-g802ab7d0db5b=
5a=