From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7D7FD389A12F; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:26:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D7FD389A12F
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/103960] Clang's -Wunknown-attributes is more useful than
 -Wattributes
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:26:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-103960-4-iuI6Ny8Ejh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-103960-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-103960-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:26:36 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D103960

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So it looks like the warning is coming from the front-end though and not fr=
om
c-family :).

I noticed this because take:
struct MyStruct;
[[gg (read_only, 1)]] int my_func (const struct MyStruct * const self);

----- CUT ----
The C front-end produces:
<source>:2:1: warning: 'gg' attribute ignored [-Wattributes]

While the C++ front-end produces:
<source>:2:70: warning: 'gg' attribute directive ignored [-Wattributes]=