public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86
@ 2022-01-12 23:05 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-12 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Bug ID: 103998
Summary: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite
regressions on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm seeing on x86_64-linux:
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\}
vect.exp=vect-tail-nomask-1.c i386.exp='pr88531* vect-reduc-1.c'"
rm -rf testsuite/gcc-parallel
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc'
(rootme=`${PWDCMD-pwd}`; export rootme; \
srcdir=`cd ../../gcc; ${PWDCMD-pwd}` ; export srcdir ; \
if [ -n "" ] \
&& [ -n "$GCC_RUNTEST_PARALLELIZE_DIR" ] \
&& [ -f testsuite/gcc-parallel/finished ]; then \
rm -rf testsuite/gcc; \
else \
cd testsuite/gcc; \
rm -f tmp-site.exp; \
sed '/set tmpdir/ s|testsuite$|testsuite/gcc|' \
< ../../site.exp > tmp-site.exp; \
/bin/sh ${srcdir}/../move-if-change tmp-site.exp site.exp; \
EXPECT=`if [ -f ${rootme}/../expect/expect ] ; then echo
${rootme}/../expect/expect ; else echo expect ; fi` ; export EXPECT ; \
if [ -f ${rootme}/../expect/expect ] ; then \
TCL_LIBRARY=`cd .. ; cd ${srcdir}/../tcl/library ; ${PWDCMD-pwd}` ; \
export TCL_LIBRARY ; \
fi ; \
`if [ -f ${srcdir}/../dejagnu/runtest ] ; then echo
${srcdir}/../dejagnu/runtest ; else echo runtest; fi` --tool gcc
--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} vect.exp=vect-tail-nomask-1.c
i386.exp='pr88531* vect-reduc-1.c'; \
if [ -n "$GCC_RUNTEST_PARALLELIZE_DIR" ] ; then \
touch ${rootme}/testsuite/gcc-parallel/finished; \
fi ; \
fi )
WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file.
Test run by jakub on Wed Jan 12 23:52:59 2022
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix/-m32
unix/-m64
Running target unix/-m32
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific
interface file.
Running /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "LOOP EPILOGUE
VECTORIZED \\(MODE=V16QI\\)" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "LOOP EPILOGUE VECTORIZED \\(MODE=V16QI\\)" 2
Running /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/i386.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1b.c scan-assembler-times vgatherdpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1b.c scan-assembler-times vmulpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1c.c scan-assembler-times vgatherdpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1c.c scan-assembler-times vmulpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2b.c scan-assembler-times vmulps 2
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2c.c scan-assembler-times vmulps 2
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-reduc-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP EPILOGUE
VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-reduc-1.c scan-assembler-times padd 5
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m32 ===
# of expected passes 16
# of unexpected failures 10
Running target unix/-m64
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific
interface file.
Running /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "LOOP EPILOGUE
VECTORIZED \\(MODE=V16QI\\)" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "LOOP EPILOGUE VECTORIZED \\(MODE=V16QI\\)" 2
Running /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/i386.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1b.c scan-assembler-times vgatherqpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1b.c scan-assembler-times vmulpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1c.c scan-assembler-times vgatherqpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1c.c scan-assembler-times vmulpd 4
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2b.c scan-assembler-times vmulps 2
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-2c.c scan-assembler-times vmulps 2
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-reduc-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP EPILOGUE
VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-reduc-1.c scan-assembler-times padd 5
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 16
# of unexpected failures 10
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 32
# of unexpected failures 20
/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/xgcc version 12.0.0 20220112 (experimental) (GCC)
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc'
None of this was present when I bootstrapped/regtested 24 hours ago with
r12-6420 reverted.
If I revert r12-6523 and r12-6420 on current trunk, then all these pass again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-12 23:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-12 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-12 23:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-12 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |103997
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
pr88531-* is recorded as PR 103997.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
[Bug 103997] gcc.target/i386/pr88531-??.c scan-assembler-times FAILs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: crazylht at gmail dot com @ 2022-01-13 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
r12-6420 also causes
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (internal compiler error: in operator[], at
vec.h:889)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
@ 2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: crazylht at gmail dot com @ 2022-01-13 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> r12-6420 also causes
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (internal compiler error: in operator[], at
> vec.h:889)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (test for excess errors)
It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
@ 2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
That was PR 103971 I think.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> > It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
>
> That was PR 103971 I think.
Which was fixed by g:016bd7523131b645bca5b5530c81ab5149922743 .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue is likely the same as in PR103997, I've commented there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-25 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Bug 103998 depends on bug 103997, which changed state.
Bug 103997 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr88531-??.c scan-assembler-times FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-25 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe all are fixed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-25 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).