* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-12 23:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-12 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-12 23:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-12 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |103997
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
pr88531-* is recorded as PR 103997.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
[Bug 103997] gcc.target/i386/pr88531-??.c scan-assembler-times FAILs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-12 23:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: crazylht at gmail dot com @ 2022-01-13 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
r12-6420 also causes
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (internal compiler error: in operator[], at
vec.h:889)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:34 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
@ 2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: crazylht at gmail dot com @ 2022-01-13 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> r12-6420 also causes
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (internal compiler error: in operator[], at
> vec.h:889)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr94494.c (test for excess errors)
It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:44 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
@ 2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
That was PR 103971 I think.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> > It seems to be fixed on latest trunk, or maybe latent?
>
> That was PR 103971 I think.
Which was fixed by g:016bd7523131b645bca5b5530c81ab5149922743 .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 3:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-13 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue is likely the same as in PR103997, I've commented there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-13 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-25 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Bug 103998 depends on bug 103997, which changed state.
Bug 103997 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr88531-??.c scan-assembler-times FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/103998] [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 since r12-6420 and r12-6523
2022-01-12 23:05 [Bug tree-optimization/103998] New: [12 Regression] Recent vectorizer testsuite regressions on x86 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-25 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103998
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe all are fixed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread