public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "eggert at cs dot ucla.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104060] New: -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm on address of local array
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 03:41:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104060-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104060

            Bug ID: 104060
           Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm on address of local
                    array
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 52209
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52209&action=edit
compile with 'gcc -Wuninitialized' to see the false alarm

I ran into this problem when compiling an experimental version of GNU coreutils
with gcc 11.2.1 20211203 (Red Hat 11.2.1-7), x86-64.

This is a regression, since gcc 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-4) does not have
the problem.

Compile the attached program with 'gcc -Wuninitialized -S
false-alarm-uninit.c'. There should be no output, but GCC outputs the
following. The diagnostic is incorrect, as bin_buffer_unaligned is an array
that is never read from or written to. Apparently GCC is getting confused
because the array's address is taken (but that address is never dereferenced).

false-alarm-uninit.c: In function ‘digest_check’:
false-alarm-uninit.c:13:31: warning: ‘bin_buffer_unaligned’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   13 |   unsigned char *bin_buffer = ptr_align (bin_buffer_unaligned, 1024);
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
false-alarm-uninit.c:2:1: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const void *’ to
‘ptr_align’ declared here
    2 | ptr_align (void const *ptr, unsigned long alignment)
      | ^~~~~~~~~
false-alarm-uninit.c:12:17: note: ‘bin_buffer_unaligned’ declared here
   12 |   unsigned char bin_buffer_unaligned[10000];
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-17  3:41 eggert at cs dot ucla.edu [this message]
2022-01-17  3:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104060] [11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17  8:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21  7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104060] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104060-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).