public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
@ 2022-01-18 1:21 turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-01-18 1:35 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: turningtides at outlook dot de @ 2022-01-18 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Bug ID: 104079
Summary: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at
cp/except.c:1192
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: turningtides at outlook dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 52214
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52214&action=edit
gcc -c main.cpp main.o
main.cpp:6:46: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
6 | void SNFP( void *n ) noexcept(noexcept(cn( n, n )))
| ~~^~~~~~~~
0x5fcb2b nothrow_spec_p(tree_node const*)
../../src/gcc/cp/except.c:1192
0x5fcb2b nothrow_spec_p(tree_node const*)
../../src/gcc/cp/except.c:1184
0x108ec56 set_flags_from_callee(tree_node*)
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:334
0x108b529 build_call_a(tree_node*, int, tree_node**)
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:371
0x108ad76 build_cxx_call(tree_node*, int, tree_node**, int, tree_node*)
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:10057
0x1073257 build_over_call
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:9561
0x1134b3c build_new_method_call_1
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:10814
0x1134696 build_new_method_call(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc,
vl_embed>**, tree_node*, int, tree_node**, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:10890
0x106298f finish_call_expr(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**,
bool, bool, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/semantics.c:2751
0x10da2d2 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:20485
0x10db12c tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:20012
0x1014712 instantiate_non_dependent_expr_internal(tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:6342
0x1014712 instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae(tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:6370
0x1014712 instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae(tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:6354
0x1014712 build_noexcept_spec(tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/except.c:1240
0xfb9ee9 cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier
../../src/gcc/cp/parser.c:26836
0xfb9ee9 cp_parser_class_specifier_1
../../src/gcc/cp/parser.c:25148
0xfa344c cp_parser_class_specifier
../../src/gcc/cp/parser.c:25235
0xfa344c cp_parser_type_specifier
../../src/gcc/cp/parser.c:18478
0xfa052c cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq
../../src/gcc/cp/parser.c:15089
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-11/README.Bugs> for instructions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
@ 2022-01-18 1:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code,
| |needs-bisection
Last reconfirmed| |2022-01-18
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |10.1.0
Known to work| |9.1.0, 9.4.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[10/11/12 Regression]
|nothrow_spec_p, at |internal compiler error: in
|cp/except.c:1192 |nothrow_spec_p, at
| |cp/except.c:1192
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-01-18 1:35 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 1:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A little more reduced:
template <typename DT>
struct AT
{
static void cn() noexcept(noexcept(DT::CN()));
void SNFP( void *n ) noexcept(noexcept(cn()));
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-01-18 1:35 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 1:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=96242
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A little more reduced:
template <bool b>
struct AT
{
static void cn() noexcept(b);
void SNFP( void *n ) noexcept(noexcept(cn()));
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-18 1:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=52869
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I suspect the patch which fixed PR 52869 caused this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-18 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 8:08 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-18 7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 8:08 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 8:14 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11/12 Regression]
|internal compiler error: in |internal compiler error: in
|nothrow_spec_p, at |nothrow_spec_p, at
|cp/except.c:1192 |cp/except.c:1192 since
| |r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-18 8:08 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-18 8:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-02 18:01 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-18 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |9.1.0, 9.4.0
Target Milestone|10.4 |9.5
Known to work|9.1.0, 9.4.0 |8.5.0
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
|internal compiler error: in |internal compiler error: in
|nothrow_spec_p, at |nothrow_spec_p, at
|cp/except.c:1192 since |cp/except.c:1192 since
|r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e |r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't know how I messed up testing 9.x. Anyways my reduced testcase fails
there too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-18 8:14 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-02 18:01 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-02-03 12:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: turningtides at outlook dot de @ 2022-02-02 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #7 from Martin Turski <turningtides at outlook dot de> ---
ETA?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-02 18:01 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
@ 2022-02-03 12:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-03 23:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-03 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-03 12:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-03 23:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-03 23:59 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-03 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82e31c8973eb1a752c2ffd01005efe291d35cee3
commit r12-7041-g82e31c8973eb1a752c2ffd01005efe291d35cee3
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Feb 3 18:54:23 2022 -0500
c++: dependence of member noexcept-spec [PR104079]
Here a stale TYPE_DEPENDENT_P/_P_VALID value for f's function type
after replacing the type's DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT with the parsed dependent
noexcept-spec causes us to try to instantiate g's noexcept-spec ahead
of time (since it in turn appears non-dependent), leading to an ICE.
This patch fixes this by clearing TYPE_DEPENDENT_P_VALID in
fixup_deferred_exception_variants appropriately (as in
build_cp_fntype_variant).
That turns out to fix the testcase for C++17 but not for C++11/14,
because it's not until C++17 that a noexcept-spec is part of (and
therefore affects dependence of) the function type. Since dependence of
NOEXCEPT_EXPR is defined in terms of instantiation dependence, the most
appropriate fix for earlier dialects seems to be to make instantiation
dependence consider dependence of a noexcept-spec.
PR c++/104079
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (value_dependent_noexcept_spec_p): New predicate split
out from ...
(dependent_type_p_r): ... here.
(instantiation_dependent_r): Use value_dependent_noexcept_spec_p
to consider dependence of a noexcept-spec before C++17.
* tree.cc (fixup_deferred_exception_variants): Clear
TYPE_DEPENDENT_P_VALID.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept74.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept74a.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-03 23:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-03 23:59 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 19:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-03 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
|internal compiler error: in |internal compiler error: in
|nothrow_spec_p, at |nothrow_spec_p, at
|cp/except.c:1192 since |cp/except.c:1192 since
|r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e |r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 12 so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-03 23:59 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-07 19:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 19:23 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-07 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e95c514cadc4517b7910ead5f8c1dd5b4fd4d991
commit r11-9794-ge95c514cadc4517b7910ead5f8c1dd5b4fd4d991
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Feb 3 18:54:23 2022 -0500
c++: dependence of member noexcept-spec [PR104079]
Here a stale TYPE_DEPENDENT_P/_P_VALID value for f's function type
after replacing the type's DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT with the parsed dependent
noexcept-spec causes us to try to instantiate g's noexcept-spec ahead
of time (since it in turn appears non-dependent), leading to an ICE.
This patch fixes this by clearing TYPE_DEPENDENT_P_VALID in
fixup_deferred_exception_variants appropriately (as in
build_cp_fntype_variant).
That turns out to fix the testcase for C++17 but not for C++11/14,
because it's not until C++17 that a noexcept-spec is part of (and
therefore affects dependence of) the function type. Since dependence of
NOEXCEPT_EXPR is defined in terms of instantiation dependence, the most
appropriate fix for earlier dialects seems to be to make instantiation
dependence consider dependence of a noexcept-spec.
PR c++/104079
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.c (value_dependent_noexcept_spec_p): New predicate split
out from ...
(dependent_type_p_r): ... here.
(instantiation_dependent_r): Use value_dependent_noexcept_spec_p
to consider dependence of a noexcept-spec before C++17.
* tree.c (fixup_deferred_exception_variants): Clear
TYPE_DEPENDENT_P_VALID.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept74.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept74a.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 82e31c8973eb1a752c2ffd01005efe291d35cee3)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-07 19:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-07 19:23 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: turningtides at outlook dot de @ 2022-04-07 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #11 from Martin Turski <turningtides at outlook dot de> ---
Thank you, Patrick Palka. I am for now unable to verify but do trust your
assessment. Good job! Will come back if I come to verify it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-07 19:23 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
@ 2022-05-27 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104079] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Known to fail| |10.5.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.3
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in GCC 11.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 9:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-18 1:21 [Bug c++/104079] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-01-18 1:35 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 1:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 8:08 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1192 since r9-4662-g0d699def39bb937e marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 8:14 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11/12 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-02 18:01 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-02-03 12:55 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-03 23:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-03 23:59 ` [Bug c++/104079] [9/10/11 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 19:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07 19:23 ` turningtides at outlook dot de
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/104079] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).