public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fchelnokov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/104111] New: Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:21:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111

            Bug ID: 104111
           Summary: Concept evaluation depends on context where it was
                    first checked
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Please consider a concept and a class definitions:
```
template<class T>
concept has_private = requires(){ &T::private_;};

class B{
   int private_;
   friend class A;
};
```

If we first check the concept inside `A` then it will be always evaluated to
true:
```
class A{
   static_assert( has_private<B> );
};
static_assert( has_private<B> );
```
Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/eYP6Tq7Y7

But if we first check the concept outside `A` then it will be always evaluated
to false:
```
static_assert( !has_private<B> );
class A{
   static_assert( !has_private<B> );
};

```
Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/vsTx4oTaE

Clang has the same behavior. At the same time MSVC always evaluates the concept
to false, and it looks correct, because context evaluation shall not depend on
the context.

Related discussion: https://godbolt.org/z/vsTx4oTaE

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-19  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-19  8:21 fchelnokov at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-01-19  8:22 ` [Bug c++/104111] " fchelnokov at gmail dot com
2022-01-19  8:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-19 14:19 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-21 14:27 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21  7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 17:58 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 22:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-31 19:29 ` [Bug c++/104111] [DR2589] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 17:11 ` steve+gcc at tecwec dot eu
2024-02-22 22:50 ` webrown.cpp at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).