public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fchelnokov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104111] New: Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:21:36 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Bug ID: 104111 Summary: Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Please consider a concept and a class definitions: ``` template<class T> concept has_private = requires(){ &T::private_;}; class B{ int private_; friend class A; }; ``` If we first check the concept inside `A` then it will be always evaluated to true: ``` class A{ static_assert( has_private<B> ); }; static_assert( has_private<B> ); ``` Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/eYP6Tq7Y7 But if we first check the concept outside `A` then it will be always evaluated to false: ``` static_assert( !has_private<B> ); class A{ static_assert( !has_private<B> ); }; ``` Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/vsTx4oTaE Clang has the same behavior. At the same time MSVC always evaluates the concept to false, and it looks correct, because context evaluation shall not depend on the context. Related discussion: https://godbolt.org/z/vsTx4oTaE
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 8:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-19 8:21 fchelnokov at gmail dot com [this message] 2022-01-19 8:22 ` [Bug c++/104111] " fchelnokov at gmail dot com 2022-01-19 8:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-19 14:19 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-21 14:27 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-21 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 17:58 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 22:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-31 19:29 ` [Bug c++/104111] [DR2589] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-29 10:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-22 17:11 ` steve+gcc at tecwec dot eu 2024-02-22 22:50 ` webrown.cpp at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).