From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 05A5F3858C3A; Sat,  5 Feb 2022 08:07:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05A5F3858C3A
From: "vital.had at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/104117] [9,10,11,12 Regression] Darwin ppc64 uses
 invalid non-PIC address to access constants (in PIC code).
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:06:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure, ra, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vital.had at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104117-4-1R8QORdqqm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 08:07:00 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104117

--- Comment #14 from Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> I think there are two code spots whose pitfalls resulted in the PR.
>=20
> The first one is in rs6000.cc::legitimate_lo_sum_address_p which permits
> wrong pic low-sum address.
>=20
> Another one is in lra-constraints.cc::process_address_1 which permits put
> wrong low-sum address in reg and use the reg in memory.
>=20
> The following patch solves the problem:


Does this also address Bug 104118?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104118=