public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/104143] New: [F2018] Accept scalar actual arguments to assumed-type assumed-size array dummies [type(*), dimension(*)] Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:43:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104143-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104143 Bug ID: 104143 Summary: [F2018] Accept scalar actual arguments to assumed-type assumed-size array dummies [type(*), dimension(*)] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Passing a (non-character) scalar to an assumed-type assumed-size array dummy is now permitted - new in Fortran 2018 (see last bullet in the quote below). Fortran 2008 (12.5.2.4 Ordinary dummy variables): "... If the actual argument is a noncoindexed scalar, the corresponding dummy argument shall be scalar unless the actual argument is default character, of type character with the C character kind (15.2.2), or is an element or substring of an element of an array that is not an assumed-shape, pointer, or polymorphic array." Fortran 2018: "If the actual argument is a noncoindexed scalar, the corresponding dummy argument shall be scalar unless • the actual argument is default character, of type character with the C character kind (18.2.2), or is an element or substring of an element of an array that is not an assumed-shape, pointer, or polymorphic array, • the dummy argument has assumed-rank, or • the dummy argument is an assumed-type assumed-size array." Example: interface subroutine foo(x) type(*) :: x(*) end end interface integer :: a call foo(a) end (When a generic interface is used, passing a scalar or array element to an assumed-size array is not permitted - at least that's how GCC+ifort have implemented it.) (The new feature avoids the need to use the '!GCC$ ATTRIBUTES NO_ARG_CHECK' attribute as workaround.)
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 8:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-20 8:43 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-09-20 21:06 ` [Bug fortran/104143] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104143-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).