From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C20D93858D3C; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:10:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C20D93858D3C
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/104209] [9/10/11/12 Regression]
 gcc.dg/torture/pr20314-2.c ICE with -m32 -fPIC in lra_split_hard_reg_for
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:10:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code, inline-asm, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104209-4-EjvLXn9nGJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:10:59 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104209

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here is the testcase:
int a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l;

void
f1 (void)
{
  __asm__ volatile (""
                    : [a] "+r" (a), [b] "+r" (b), [c] "+r" (c), [d] "+r" (d=
),
                      [e] "+r" (e), [f] "+r" (f), [g] "+r" (g), [h] "+r" (h=
),
                      [i] "+r" (i), [j] "+r" (j), [k] "+r" (k), [l] "+r" (l=
));
}=