From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6A6B93858418; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:11:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A6B93858418 From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104255] parsing trailing return type fails with parameter pack expansion when two parameter packs at present Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:11:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:11:32 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104255 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- The error message is obscure, but it seems what GCC has issue with here is = the use of the function parameter seq2 in the trailing return type occurring outside of an unevaluated context. I'm not totally sure if the testcase is valid (https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope.param#note-1 might suggest it's not?),= but one workaround is to replace the use of seq2 in the trailing return type wi= th decltype(seq2){} (which works because index_sequence is an empty type). Here's a minimal testcase demonstrating the issue struct empty { }; constexpr int f(empty) { return 0; } template struct A { }; auto g(empty e) -> A; which is rejected with error: use of parameter outside function body before =E2=80=98)=E2=80=99 = token due to 'e' being used outside of an unevaluated context within the signatur= e of the function.=