public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "de34 at live dot cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/104264] New: __is_trivially_copyable fails to report non-recursively trivially copyable classes
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 03:34:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104264

            Bug ID: 104264
           Summary: __is_trivially_copyable fails to report
                    non-recursively trivially copyable classes
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: de34 at live dot cn
  Target Milestone: ---

The current definition of trivially copyable class ([class.prop]
/2) is not recursive. I.e. a trivially copyable class may have a base class or
data member of a non-trivially copyable class type.

The following example is accepted by clang, msvc, and icc, but rejected by gcc
(all of which use __is_trivially_copyable). Perhaps gcc considers Supressor as
non-trivially copyable because it has a non-trivially copyable data member.

struct Weird {
    Weird() = default;
    Weird(const Weird&) = default;
    Weird &operator=(const Weird&) = default;
    // non-trivial
    constexpr Weird(Weird&&) noexcept {}
    constexpr Weird &operator=(Weird&&) noexcept { return *this; }
};

struct Supressor {
    Weird w;

    Supressor() = default;
    Supressor(const Supressor&) = default;
    Supressor &operator=(const Supressor&) = default;
    // move functions are supressed
    // non-trivial move functions are not called
};

int main()
{
    static_assert(!__is_trivially_copyable(Weird), "");
    static_assert(__is_trivially_copyable(Supressor), "");
}

Compiler Explorer link: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/4o1vPdz86

The issue might be related to CWG 2463 (https://wg21.link/cwg2463). CWG DR 1734
seems unrelated,

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  3:34 de34 at live dot cn [this message]
2023-09-23 13:44 ` [Bug c++/104264] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).