From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8C9263858D32; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 04:23:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8C9263858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1673843014; bh=cAwFuRYVK1NL0ZyvS3q6HaYp/UJM4aom0wiIhwCnDUM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bOvYw7XHbpMXvDaOE+0FS7IoEVVukhQpSjkpehhPYkUjUi+J22vt7x0TmePolCHZ6 MSRqV3PuI4v3DVN2uQMMIXkcTLwvuHHmUfG4ibeRaxbgbmTk1Zycq1qtFb9iIOEMTY MRhh43wFeWHL/hGmhxXf/dwDM8N4tjtr7dpshcuY= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 04:23:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104282 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > I think there's any existing bug about this, and it's an open issue in the > ABI PR 98995 .=