From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 475323858D35; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:27:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 475323858D35 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/104321] New: Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 09:27:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 09:27:25 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104321 Bug ID: 104321 Summary: Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following assignment is dead: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:7108 /* if (cond) { block2 } */ tmp =3D fold_build2_loc (input_location, MODIFY_EXPR, void_type_node, data, fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (data), null_pointer_node)); tmp =3D build3_v (COND_EXPR, cond_var, gfc_finish_block (&block2), build_empty_stmt (input_location)); It's likely a bug?=