From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6DA903858D3C; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:44:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DA903858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666039485; bh=ifagU+nuNYJoJTVNIM0L6wBX37n0twmxCIgBoJZGMYM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DIEvizjwc81qK/xw+dF5Auz6EFTsK8NBD1ISu66Rdl+UPCn9kJTvhM5se7laV2sQq WgsEReaSjN8nNXVYVSVx7suzh6GfRe9v+/FTaoq75hWiNCP4G13QljS8sfcxRjE+k+ UFPFBJNcnMlJmA2rcuLMDCDXX5B8Ir+V5huWE5jw= From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/104330] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.cc:8294 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:44:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104330 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl -= -- On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:24:36PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >=20 > Steve, >=20 > I think it is obvious that we cannot simplify IMAGE_INDEX here. > If you don't object, I will commit your fix for you as obvious. >=20 No objection. Feel free to grab anything I post in bugzilla and use it as you see fit. You need not include me the ChangeLog as co-author unless you want people to yell at me instead of you. :-)=