From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8A1033858C3A; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:59:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8A1033858C3A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678312766; bh=G7uv0fHQz/gmNVz1FyLI0/iXGnoEfSd8OTJyyZX2VsE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nUUbZK+w9f+UXlAkLRYWce36EWFwmUXIF7cGgE9aNsxrDM/cGbyrTN7T5GsXpfgSc 8b0bg8yOazkSc8B75V7ffPFDq60Cz86f7oXDUf4zMm24dc8SWQKlPnET/0MAlp/M5D hAQ1HSafL13UxGUVtHlpyBlFWmXM9wuzVp7BOJyw= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/104332] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 21:59:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104332 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This adjustment of the logic also fixes the ICE and the accepts-invalid: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc index 2780c82c798..c7f42dd2a4d 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc @@ -15933,8 +15942,8 @@ resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym) /* First, make sure the variable is declared at the module-level scope (J3/04-007, Section 15.3). */ - if (sym->ns->proc_name->attr.flavor !=3D FL_MODULE && - sym->attr.in_common =3D=3D 0) + if (!(sym->ns->proc_name && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.flavor =3D=3D FL_MODULE) + && sym->attr.in_common =3D=3D 0) { gfc_error ("Variable %qs at %L cannot be BIND(C) because it " "is neither a COMMON block nor declared at the "=