public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/104354] [12 regression] internal error with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 12:27:11 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104354-4-OyvCbWPu7S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-104354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b17c2c6cbc34056ae878beed2351bf77a8f57a0 commit r12-10087-g5b17c2c6cbc34056ae878beed2351bf77a8f57a0 Author: Steve Baird <baird@adacore.com> Date: Wed Nov 16 09:28:22 2022 -0800 Fix nternal compiler error for Sequential Partition_Elaboration_Policy In some cases, compilation of a function with a limited class-wide result type could fail with an ICE if a Sequential Partition_Elaboration_Policy is specified. To prevent this, we really want that specifying a Sequential Partition_Elaboration_Policy to have the side effect of imposing a No_Task_Hierarchy restriction. But doing that in a straightforward way leads to problems with incorrectly accepting violations of H.6(6). So a new restriction, No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit, is introduced. gcc/ada/ PR ada/104354 * libgnat/s-rident.ads: Define a new restriction, No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit. This is like the No_Task_Hierarchy restriction, but with the difference that setting this restriction does not mean the H.6(6) post-compilation check is satisified. * exp_ch6.adb (Add_Task_Actuals_To_Build_In_Place_Call): If it is known that the function result cannot have tasks, then pass in a null literal for the activation chain actual parameter. This avoids generating a reference to an entity that Build_Activation_Chain_Entity may have chosen not to generate a declaration for. * gnatbind.adb (List_Applicable_Restrictions): Do not list the No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit restriction. * restrict.adb: Special treatment for the No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit restriction in functions Get_Restriction_Id and Restriction_Active. The former is needed to disallow the (unlikely) case that a user tries to explicitly reference the No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit restriction. * sem_prag.adb (Analyze_Pragma): If a Sequential Partition_Elaboration_Policy is specified (and the No_Task_Hierarchy restriction is not already enabled), then enable the No_Task_Hierarchy_Implicit restriction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 12:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-02-02 20:43 [Bug ada/104354] New: ICE " simon at pushface dot org 2022-02-02 20:47 ` [Bug ada/104354] " simon at pushface dot org 2024-01-09 10:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-09 11:51 ` simon at pushface dot org 2024-01-09 12:13 ` [Bug ada/104354] [12 regression] internal error " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-09 12:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-01-09 12:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104354-4-OyvCbWPu7S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).