From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8BC7A3858D37; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 02:45:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8BC7A3858D37 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104360] Failure to optimize abs pattern (x^(x<0?-1:0)) - (x<0?-1:0) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:45:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_severity short_desc keywords cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:45:16 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104360 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|Failure to optimize abs |Failure to optimize abs |pattern on vector types |pattern (x^(x<0?-1:0)) - | |(x<0?-1:0) Keywords| |missed-optimization Last reconfirmed| |2022-02-03 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Even the scalar version is not optimized: typedef short i16; i16 abs_i16(i16 x) { auto isN =3D -(x < 0); x ^=3D isN; return x - isN; } Shouldn't be too hard to optimize for both. What is funny is clang/LLVM does not catch the scalar version either unless= you do: (x < i16{}) ? -1 : 0=