public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vstinner at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/104389] New: HUGE_VAL * 0.0 is no longer a NaN
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:02:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104389-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104389

            Bug ID: 104389
           Summary: HUGE_VAL * 0.0 is no longer a NaN
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vstinner at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 52352
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52352&action=edit
Reproducer: huge_val_0_nan.c

The Python project uses "HUGE_VAL * 0" to get a Not-a-Number (NaN) double
value. Pseudo-code:

#define Py_NAN (Py_HUGE_VAL * 0.)
double my_nan(void)
{ return Py_NAN; }

Until Fedora gcc-12.0.1-0.4.fc36.x86_64
(03182470d2d2b272f06500184acab6b8ed78d8ad), it worked well.

With Fedora gcc-12.0.1-0.5.fc36.x86_64
(fb6057a2be99e071993fb54a5d338ab0febba8ff), my_nan() now returns zero (0.0).

Try attached huge_val_0_nan.c.

gcc-12.0.1-0.5.fc36.x86_64 output:
---
(1) Compute HUGE_VAL * 0 in the C compiler
isnan? 0
bytes: [0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00]

(2) Compute HUGE_VAL * 0 at runtime
isnan? 1
bytes: [0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xfffffff8, 0xffffffff]
---

gcc-11.2.1-7.fc35.x86_64 output:
---
(1) Compute HUGE_VAL * 0 in the C compiler
isnan? 1
bytes: [0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xfffffff8, 0x7f]

(2) Compute HUGE_VAL * 0 at runtime
isnan? 1
bytes: [0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xfffffff8, 0xffffffff]
---

In Python, Py_NAN is defined as "#define Py_NAN (Py_HUGE_VAL * 0.)" at:

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/bf95ff91f2c1fc5a57190491f9ccdc63458b089e/Include/pymath.h#L60

FYI diff of the Fedora package between -4 and -5, the most important part if
the Git commit which changed ;-)

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/c/398138b5f3809856b98eb4241b3c9f70da3fce9b?branch=rawhide

             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 19:02 vstinner at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-02-04 19:15 ` [Bug c/104389] [10/11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-04 19:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-04 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-04 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-04 19:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104389] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-04 22:28 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-05  9:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-05 10:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104389] [12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-07  7:15 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104389-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).