public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/104426] -fsanitize=undefined causes constexpr failures
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:01:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104426-4-ktajBrYU7h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-104426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104426

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That's a consequence of -fsanitize=undefined turning on
> -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks (it has to, otherwise -fsanitize=null
> wouldn't work properly).
> And -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks says that variables or functions can be
> placed at NULL address.

Note that's "historical" mostly, the correct way to check whether objects can
be at NULL address is the corresponding address-space hook.  Of course that
leaves us with no way for the user to override what the target thinks (unless
the target provides its own way to do that).

IMHO we can simply take away this option from the user, it was a mistake to
document it that way when it had this effect due to lack of a better way.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 17:46 [Bug c++/104426] New: " pdimov at gmail dot com
2022-02-07 21:14 ` [Bug c++/104426] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-07 21:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-07 21:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-07 21:29 ` pdimov at gmail dot com
2022-02-08  9:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-02-08 10:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-15  9:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104426-4-ktajBrYU7h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).