From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7E7F63858413; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:04:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E7F63858413 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1661511858; bh=GBCNYxIJN0X+Ztd4icvoUXiUx1Y5wr9ExgUpTsYH6/s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I5bc2WxjII2OTDaDoChWVaYocmjjTcC96VqiQVZUvUxhpEIUC70Iibb3PJVHBGXmh lus837x8BXqDUGe2kRE+ZZ3GSSFgLn1c1EYO96HrMpJhrv50m7Wq/7uwkZkp0imxOB p/TsRYv3MehDnPw4RjpCaJySOLQyYFwy8oHSQ7ZA= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/104430] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:04:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104430 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- The ICE for comment 7 looks a little different, so a new test does seem worthwhile: Bad: 539 /home/remote/jwakely/gcc-bisect-objs/f951.r12-7525 ice.f90:7:30: 7 | forall( iix=3D1:4, iiy=3D1:4 ) | 1 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0x1459b77 crash_signal ../../gcc/toplev.cc:322 0xf22b21 split_tree ../../gcc/fold-const.cc:815 0xf5139c fold_binary_loc(unsigned int, tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*) ../../gcc/fold-const.cc:11269 0xf5d559 fold_build2_loc(unsigned int, tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*) ../../gcc/fold-const.cc:13814 0xc21e73 gfc_conv_expr_op ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:3921 0xc35f01 gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:9394 0xc36049 gfc_conv_expr_val(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:9451 0xc3f8bf gfc_conv_intrinsic_function_args ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc:237 0xc3face gfc_conv_intrinsic_conversion ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc:295 0xc60a8b gfc_conv_intrinsic_function(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc:10288 0xc32027 gfc_conv_function_expr ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:8258 0xc35f19 gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:9398 0xc3d718 gfc_trans_assignment_1 ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:11686 0xc3ead6 gfc_trans_assignment(gfc_expr*, gfc_expr*, bool, bool, bool, bool) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:12077 0xca2aab gfc_trans_forall_1 ../../gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc:5192 0xca2eb6 gfc_trans_forall(gfc_code*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc:5298 0xbca74c trans_code ../../gcc/fortran/trans.cc:2064 0xbcaa4e gfc_trans_code(gfc_code*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans.cc:2268 0xc9b362 gfc_trans_block_construct(gfc_code*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc:2314 0xbca631 trans_code ../../gcc/fortran/trans.cc:2012 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug). Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions.=