public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/104430] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:59:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104430-4-vnGRnmTtpt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-104430-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The patch also fixes an ICE for this code, taken from
https://stackoverflow.com/q/73498995/981959

program main

    integer, dimension(1:2) :: iii
    real, dimension(1:4,1:4,1:2) :: myArray

    associate(iix => iii(1), iiy=> iii(2) )
    forall( iix=1:4, iiy=1:4 )
        myArray(iix,iiy,1) = iix + iiy
        myArray(iix,iiy,2) = (iix + iiy)*10
    endforall
    end associate

    print *, myArray(:,:,1)
    print *, myArray(:,:,2)

end program main


I know nothing about Fortran, but it looks sufficiently different to me that
maybe it's worth adding another test based on this code, so we don't regress.

The question of whether to backport to gcc-10 or close this is still waiting
for an answer too.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 18:49 [Bug fortran/104430] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-02-08  9:04 ` [Bug fortran/104430] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-24 10:44 ` [Bug fortran/104430] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 21:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-19  7:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:47 ` [Bug fortran/104430] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-27 19:55 ` [Bug fortran/104430] [10 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-26 10:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-08-26 11:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02  8:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104430-4-vnGRnmTtpt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).