public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/104442] atomic<T>::wait incorrectly loops in case of spurious notification when __waiter is shared
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:27:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104442-4-gk8RnAUJwi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-104442-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442

Thomas Rodgers <rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-02-09
                 CC|                            |rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Rodgers <rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I took a look at whether or not it made sense to do a different refactoring
with this version of the implementation and I don't believe that it does (the
implementation detail here is likely to change substantially when we commit to
an ABI stable version) and indeed, the predicate version does exactly what this
patch proposes.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 16:31 [Bug libstdc++/104442] New: " poulhies at adacore dot com
2022-02-09  0:27 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-02-09  8:51 ` [Bug libstdc++/104442] " poulhies at adacore dot com
2022-02-09 10:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-09 15:29 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-09 20:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-09 20:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-10  8:52 ` poulhies at adacore dot com
2022-02-10 17:57 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-11  8:16 ` poulhies at adacore dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104442-4-gk8RnAUJwi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).