From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0F3C938493C0; Wed,  7 Dec 2022 11:25:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F3C938493C0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670412354;
	bh=QqVrGOBrE4E6ZhcjrQiu+hTWuc4oeaDHLkRY/Jnp0pw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sCWwJoYOxfq2TchilVNAKpplipcgiT9RAaYzs459jJJ3x30XNVrWdTZp+IEce7nOZ
	 NfZyFdDno0ncNnEMY5I5/pRm+L9EsXi0nltmZTl/hnXluBT+tPpsN+4xLCsOpMXYNQ
	 CGnJP5fl0gV9sTaawQMU2BwXC0x5nWJN7LJArDmE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104475] [12/13 Regression] Wstringop-overflow
 + atomics incorrect warning on dynamic object
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:25:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc
Message-ID: <bug-104475-4-bFOJ7aOhxS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104475

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
                   |                            |il/gcc-patches/2022-Decembe
                   |                            |r/608077.html

--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here's a patch doing that (ADDR_NONZERO) which fixes the issue.=