From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 642B73858D1E; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:40:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 642B73858D1E From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104476] New: using-decl shadowed by member function when in incomplete-class context Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:40:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:40:21 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104476 Bug ID: 104476 Summary: using-decl shadowed by member function when in incomplete-class context Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- We reject the following valid testcase: struct A { static void f(); }; struct B : A { using A::f; // #1 static void f(int); // #2 auto g() -> decltype(f()); // Call should be accepted via #1, instead rejected }; with :9:25: error: no matching function for call to =E2=80=98B::f()=E2=80= =99 :8:15: note: candidate: =E2=80=98static void B::f(int)=E2=80=99 :8:15: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 provided :9:25: error: no matching function for call to =E2=80=98B::f()=E2=80= =99 :8:15: note: candidate: =E2=80=98static void B::f(int)=E2=80=99 :8:15: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 provided Yet if we swap the order of the declarations #1 and #2, then we accept the testcase.=