From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 754B4385842B; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:46:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 754B4385842B From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/104477] New: [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference binding to temporary Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:46:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:46:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104477 Bug ID: 104477 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect reference binding to temporary Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jason at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2255r2.html The library type traits std::reference_{constructs,converts}_from_temporary will need a compiler intrinsic to implement. Apparently clang already has a __reference_binds_to_temporary with similar = but not identical semantics; I think let's see if they plan to adjust that buil= tin or add a new one before we settle on a name.=