public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104497] [11/12 Regression] Invalid gimple produced for (A?vect:vect)[i] Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:02:54 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104497-4-EIT6dXwHoB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-104497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104497 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-02-11 Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code, | |needs-bisection Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|SEGV during GIMPLE pass: |[11/12 Regression] Invalid |pre |gimple produced for | |(A?vect:vect)[i] Target Milestone|--- |11.3 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note it ICEs even at -O1 with -fchecking. Confirmed. Simplified testcase that fails with -O1 -fchecking: typedef int __attribute__((vector_size(16))) vec_t; vec_t src, inv; vec_t test(int i) { vec_t y={0}; y[i] = (i & 1 ? inv : src)[i]; return y; }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 8:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-02-11 7:34 [Bug tree-optimization/104497] New: SEGV during GIMPLE pass: pre jbeulich at suse dot com 2022-02-11 7:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104497] " jbeulich at suse dot com 2022-02-11 7:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 8:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-02-11 9:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104497] [11/12 Regression] Invalid gimple produced for (A?vect:vect)[i] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 10:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 10:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 10:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-14 8:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-14 8:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104497] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-07 9:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-07 9:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104497-4-EIT6dXwHoB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).