public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "assaiante at diag dot uniroma1.it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/104549] New: Missing variable at O2/O3 likely caused by -fearly-inlining Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:46:39 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104549 Bug ID: 104549 Summary: Missing variable at O2/O3 likely caused by -fearly-inlining Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: assaiante at diag dot uniroma1.it Target Milestone: --- In the following testing code, local variable i, which gets passed as argument to a function defined in an external module, is not visible upon the call when debugging. This behavior only occurs when the optimization level is O2 or O3. $ cat a.c void a() { int i = 0; for (; i ; ) {} test(i) ; } int main() { a(); } $ cat lib.c #include <stdio.h> void nop() { printf("\n"); } void test(int i) { printf("%d", i); } GCC and GDB version (GCC commit id: 500d3f0a302): $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 12.0.0 20211227 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ gdb --version GNU gdb (GDB) 11.2 Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. GDB trace: $ gcc -O2 -g a.c lib.c -o opt # <- same exact with O3 $ gdb -q opt Reading symbols from opt... (gdb) b 5 Breakpoint 1 at 0x400460: /home/stepping/66/reduce/a.c:5. (2 locations) (gdb) r Starting program: /home/stepping/66/reduce/opt Breakpoint 1, main () at a.c:5 5 test(i) (gdb) info locals No locals. Through some testing we found out that the optimization flag that introduces the bug is likely -fearly-inlining, which makes main() call the test() function directly. Indeed, if we add the flag -fno-early-inlining to the compilation command line used above, the variable i will appear in the current frame with its value correctly available.
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 15:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-02-15 15:46 assaiante at diag dot uniroma1.it [this message] 2022-02-15 17:30 ` [Bug debug/104549] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-16 13:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-17 12:38 ` assaiante at diag dot uniroma1.it 2022-02-17 13:48 ` assaiante at diag dot uniroma1.it
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).