public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/104550] bogus warning from -Wuninitialized + -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:53:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104550-4-YOw1jx8eCH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-104550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104550

--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> > Even in that case, filling the memory with pattern & mask instead of filling
> > the memory with pattern + __builtin_clear_padding afterwards seems like a
> > win.
> 
> So, you mean It's better to do the following for pattern init:
> 
> 1. add call to .DEFERRED_INIT(, pattern, ) during gimplification;
> 2. during RTL expansion, fill the memory with pattern & mask if the variable
> is in memory. 
> 
> how to implement "fill the memory with pattern & mask" during RTL expansion?
> currently, we use memset to fill the memory when the variable is in memory,
> pattern & mask might not fit to a BYTE-repeatable pattern that can be used
> for memset?

You can populate a buffer with the pattern and then clear_type_padding_in_mask.
Then you can create a STRING_CST out from that array and store_expr
(the_STRING_CST, DECL_RTL (var), false, false, false) - at least when DECL_RTL
(var) is a MEM.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-15 15:49 [Bug middle-end/104550] New: " qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 15:50 ` [Bug middle-end/104550] " qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 15:52 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 21:33 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 21:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 22:38 ` qing.zhao at oracle dot com
2022-02-16 10:33 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-02-16 15:05 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-16 15:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-16 16:24 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-16 16:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-16 16:57 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-17  7:54 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-02-17  8:01 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-02-17 16:47 ` qing.zhao at oracle dot com
2022-02-17 16:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-02-18  6:53 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-02-18 17:16 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-18 20:14 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-21  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-21 15:21 ` qing.zhao at oracle dot com
2022-02-28 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-28 16:00 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-104550-4-YOw1jx8eCH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).