From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2D2C2385801A; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:21:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D2C2385801A
From: "qing.zhao at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/104550] bogus warning from -Wuninitialized +
 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:21:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qing.zhao at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-104550-4-udbkkVosxA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:21:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104550

--- Comment #20 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> On Feb 21, 2022, at 1:56 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc=
.gnu.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> my question is, is the "info" in __builtin_clear_padding(&info) a REAL u=
se
>> of "info"? is it correct to report the uninitialized use message for it?
>=20
> As said I think reads emitted from __builtin_clear_padding lowering should
> not be considered for (uninit) diagnostics.
Okay.=