From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 70F1E3858C62; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 04:35:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 70F1E3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676090149;
	bh=TBhqkTSpO0mXgHgXam4AzFby2eJ4GYGxoT43E3mORCU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ei7lzo6ule+Y1pWpNqZGxYb+xdVNuj205M+dcO58/4eGqoe0HfiBRnSzNCtDdOwxt
	 Cnui8EIhOivssxbk0yPSN7weQ5Ov8mSxDM1+KqXQC9Dx5y/cwWOWKcC5/uzrAoAhjP
	 HCT+sCx40ZzBqjFxZZc6vtHO3eTyIca0VCpEUR3c=
From: "herring at lanl dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/104577] needs copy constructor for class non-type template
 parameter
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 04:35:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: herring at lanl dot gov
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-104577-4-gdoeeywK4k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-104577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-104577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104577

S. Davis Herring <herring at lanl dot gov> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |herring at lanl dot gov

--- Comment #4 from S. Davis Herring <herring at lanl dot gov> ---
The understood direction for CWG2459 makes it clear that class-type template
parameters must indeed be copied; in fact, they have to be copied twice in =
some
cases to guarantee that they have the correct value when user-provided
constructors are involved.=